mirror of
https://github.com/bdbrown4/peltier.io.git
synced 2026-11-07 19:08:27 +00:00
Commit the spec and scaffold the system it describes:
- SPEC.md: the full v0.1 engineering spec
- crates/: trust-layer Rust workspace, unit-tested
- bench-runner: interleaved ABAB scheduling with discarded warm-ups,
deterministic bootstrap CIs over the ratio of medians,
CI-lower-bound accept rule, env fingerprinting, and a CLI with
compare + A/A self-test modes (A/A verified passing end-to-end)
- diff-test: gate outcome model, sha256 corpus pin verifier that
refuses on mismatch, per-target equivalence policy parser
(byte-identical default, explicit fp-tolerance opt-in)
- ledger: append-only SQLite attempt schema with UPDATE/DELETE
refused by triggers, anti-double-attempt query
- report: cores-saved and dollars/yr ROI math over speedup CIs,
pricing.toml inputs
- playbook/: classes 1-7 with preconditions, procedure, verification
notes, and known failure modes per class
- agent/: Python package skeleton — six-tool contract and prompting
spine, harness IPC deferred to Phase 1
- config/: accept.toml (2% threshold, 30 runs/side), pricing.toml
- targets/, corpora/, results/calibration/: layout and policy docs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
Class 1 — Build configuration
Zero source changes. Always first: a large fraction of real-world CPU is lost to shipping defaults.
Preconditions
- Any CPU-bound target not already using an optimized release profile.
- Profile signature: flat-ish flamegraph with time spread across many
small frames (inlining starved); heavy call overhead into tiny leaf
functions; or a build that visibly lacks
-O2/--release. - Check before anything else:
opt-level,lto,codegen-units,panic,target-cpu(Rust);-O,-march,-flto(C/C++).
Procedure (cheapest first)
- Confirm release profile:
opt-level=3,panic=abortwhere the target permits,codegen-units=1. target-cpu=native/-march=native— only when the deployment fleet's ISA baseline is known; record the chosen baseline in the hypothesis.- LTO: thin, then fat. Watch build-time cost; fat LTO on huge targets can be a net loss for the engagement.
- PGO: instrument with the golden-replay corpus as the training run, rebuild with the profile. The corpus is representative by construction.
- BOLT (post-link layout) where the binary and toolchain permit.
Verification notes
- Flags must not include any
-ffast-math-class option — that's an equivalence change, auto-routed toneeds-human-review(SPEC §8). - Byte-identical golden replay still applies: build flags occasionally
change FP contraction on some ISAs (
-marchenabling FMA); if golden replay diverges on numeric output, stop — this class is not equivalence-preserving for that target without a tolerance policy.
Known failure modes
target-cpu=nativeon the bench machine but not the fleet: a real win that the customer cannot deploy. Pin the ISA baseline to the fleet.- PGO trained on a non-representative workload overfits the benchmark — hold out workloads (SPEC §11).
- Layout changes from LTO/BOLT interact with layout bias (§7): measured wins here especially need the randomize-and-aggregate protocol.