The SKILL.md Agent Skills standard (agentskills.io) is now read natively by
Codex, Copilot, VS Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, opencode, Goose, Amp, Zed,
Factory, and ZeroClaw — so the portable move is not per-harness adapter
files (forked content that drifts) but one canonical skill placed where
each harness actually looks.
- Spec-compliant frontmatter: license, compatibility (the Linux-only
measurement story, stated up front), version/author/tags top-level
(ZeroClaw's runtime reads those; the spec ignores unknown fields).
reference/ renamed to references/ per the spec's conventional layout.
- .agents/skills/peltier/ mirror: the cross-tool convergence path (Codex,
Zed, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Copilot, opencode, Goose, Amp). Byte-identical
to the .claude canonical, enforced by CI — drift between the two copies
is a red build, not a footnote.
- AGENTS.md at the repo root for the ~20 harnesses that read it (Claude
Code does not; CLAUDE.md remains its file). Deliberately thin: it points
at CLAUDE.md and the skill instead of restating rules.
- scripts/install-skill.sh: stamps a consumer repo at both discovery paths
(--layout claude|agents|both), or emits a script-less --zeroclaw-variant.
ZeroClaw's skill security policy blocks script files by default
(skills.allow_scripts off) — its audit rejected the full skill and passes
the variant, verified against the real zeroclaw binary. The variant loses
nothing: preflight.sh still exists exactly once, in the peltier checkout
the skill already requires, and SKILL.md now documents running it from
there. Re-implementing preflight inline is named as a refusal condition.
- CI (skill-preflight): frontmatter upgraded to a full Agent Skills spec
conformance check on BOTH copies (name rules, dir match, description and
body limits, metadata string-map), plus mirror equality and a functional
installer test (both layouts identical to canonical, variant carries no
scripts/, nonexistent target refused).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The description was an unquoted YAML scalar containing "trust layer:
equivalence" — a colon-space inside a plain scalar makes YAML parse it as a
nested mapping, so the frontmatter raised "mapping values are not allowed in
this context" and the skill would not load at all.
Quoted the scalar and replaced the colon with an em dash.
The real defect is that CI asserted the preflight script's behavior but never
checked that the skill it ships is loadable. Added a step that parses the
frontmatter, requires name/description to be non-empty strings, and requires
name to match the directory — so an unloadable skill fails the build instead
of failing the user.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The reusable artifact here was never the vendored targets — it is the
discipline: prove equivalence, prove significance, or claim nothing. This
packages it as a Claude Code skill usable from any repo.
Two modes. `verify` works anywhere, on any two shell commands in any
language: equivalence before timing -> A/A calibration -> interleaved A/B
with a bootstrap CI -> a verdict decided by the CI lower bound, never the
median. `attempt` drives the full in-repo loop (gates, pristine-baseline
verdict, ledger row, ROI report).
It drives the real bench-runner binary and refuses rather than degrade: on
an unsupported host, or with no trust layer reachable, preflight stops and
says so instead of falling back to a hand-rolled timing loop. A second copy
of the statistics is a second thing that can lie. A refusal ends the claim,
not the work.
An adversarial review of the skill caught six high-severity defects, all
fixed here — several of them the very errors the skill exists to prevent:
- verify mode had no risk classification at all. bench-runner emits only
accepted/rejected-bench; needs-human-review is minted by the in-repo
verdict path, which verify does not run. A concurrency change with
byte-identical output would have sailed through as "accepted". The skill
now makes the agent the classifier and says so explicitly.
- the accept template exposed `pin_prefix`, which is inert for
compare/aa/calibrate (only `verdict` reads it) — an agent would have set
it and reported pinning that never happened. Now documents wrapping both
sides in taskset instead.
- the equivalence gate compared stdout only, so two commands that write to
stderr and a dist/ tree would "GOLDEN PASS" on two empty files. Now hashes
stdout + stderr + exit code + artifact tree, and an empty diff over empty
output is a failed gate, not a passed one.
- nothing told the agent to build two coexisting immutable artifacts, so a
`cargo run` baseline could rebuild from the patched tree mid-bench — the
exact trap phase1-verdict-smoke-001 recorded.
- service mode was documented as generic HTTP. It is not: the server must
take <port> <doc> <iters>, print READY, and close the connection. A stock
Express app hangs the harness forever. Contract now stated.
- the CI refusal test could not pass: preflight also walks up from its own
location, so running it in-place found this very repo. The test now copies
the skill out of the tree first.
CI job `skill-preflight` asserts the contract that matters — resolve when a
trust layer is reachable, REFUSE when it is not, and work when consumed from
another repo via PELTIER_HOME. It deliberately does not assert a statistical
outcome: a shared runner is too noisy for that, which is precisely why the
skill calibrates before it claims.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An adversarial audit found the enforcement story ahead of the code: gates
that were documented as hard gates were advisory, manual, or absent, and
several human-facing claims outran the machine record. This makes the
claims true.
High findings
- Differential fuzz was documentation, not enforcement: verdict hardcoded
fuzz_iters=0 and diff-test hardcoded the gate to Skipped, while the case
studies claimed 10k-iteration fuzz on the same wins. Fuzz is now a real
pipeline gate (strict FUZZ-RESULT contract, executed count recorded), and
it is inherently baseline-vs-candidate, so it runs on the accept path and
reports Skipped in the standalone `just gates` flow. New hard rule: a
machine `accepted` verdict is impossible unless the fuzz gate actually
passed — otherwise it caps at needs-human-review.
- The agent's system prompt claimed FP/concurrency/unsafe patches were
"routed to human review automatically". No such mechanism existed. Added
a conservative lexical risk classifier (crates/verdict/src/risk.rs) that
forces needs-human-review on any would-be accept carrying those signals;
fp-tolerance equivalence always signals.
- The local verdict path ran agent-influenced code unsandboxed. It now runs
under scripts/no-net.sh (network namespace) and fails closed. Upstream
test suites are hash-verified against corpora/<t>/TESTSUITE.sha256 when
present (scripts/pin-testsuite.sh generates them).
Also fixed, found while fixing the above
- The pipeline script's `set -e` was inert (brace group as the left operand
of `&&`), so a failing candidate build did not abort the run and verdict
could bench a stale binary. Now a scoped subshell whose status is branched
on at top level.
- A wrapper that exits before exec'ing (no-net.sh refusing, bad wrapper path)
stranded RUNNING.lock and left read_verdict polling forever. Failure
accounting now lives outside the wrapper.
- harnessd's patch allowlist ignored git rename/copy headers and --no-prefix
diffs; the rename-escape case is now a committed regression test.
- The workspace did not compile on Windows (ungated Unix APIs). cfg-gated;
71 portable tests now run on both platforms.
- pin-check regenerated the corpus manifest instead of verifying it; it is
now verify-only, with a deliberate `just pin-corpus` to re-pin.
- Max RSS is captured per run on Unix; PMU counters are opt-in diagnostics
(compare --perf-stat), never part of the accept decision.
Docs now match the code, including what is NOT yet enforced: no target ships
a TESTSUITE.sha256 pin, no target declares [build].tsan, and matmul is not
wired to the fp-tolerance gate — each is stated as mechanized-but-inert
rather than done. Corrected the stale "33 ledger rows" (34), the playbook's
class-3 cJSON win (rejected), adversarial-review.md's sanitizer-separation
claim (five accepted rows carry sanitizers_clean=false), the unsupported
"40,000 requests" figure, and the blanket "historical rows record
fuzz_iters=0" (8 of 10; phase0-tokei-002/-003 record 4,332).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The kernel lane (PR #14) added a second binary to the diff-test crate
(src/bin/fp-compare.rs), which made `cargo run -p diff-test -- <target>`
— the exact invocation the target-gates-no-net CI job uses to run a target's
equivalence gate — ambiguous:
error: `cargo run` could not determine which binary to run.
available binaries: diff-test, fp-compare
Naming the primary binary via `default-run` restores the single-binary
behavior without touching the CI workflow or the gate command. Regression
was latent on main since #14 merged; this PR's CI re-run surfaced it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
The project ships as peltier.io; "hotpath" was the placeholder working name
(CLAUDE.md: "Rename freely; nothing depends on it"). Replaces the product
name in the README front page and every mdBook source chapter — book title,
nav header, and prose ("Peltier profiles…", "Peltier sells…") — plus the
theme CSS comment.
The metaphor is unchanged (a Peltier device is a thermoelectric cooler:
"spot cooling for hot paths"), and the literal noun phrase "hot paths"
stays. Two code identifiers are intentionally left as-is because they are
not prose: the `agent/hotpath_agent/` Python module path and the
`HOTPATH_ISOLATION` env var — renaming those is a code change, not a docs
one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
Phase 5 write-up for the two SPEC §13 forks now that both are built:
- results/phase5/README.md — the full argument for each fork, with the
kernel-lane demo and learned-policy ranking tables and reproduce commands.
- results/phase5/learned-policy.txt — captured `cargo run -p policy` output
over the 34-row ledger.
- docs/src/research-forks.md — new mdBook chapter, wired into SUMMARY.md.
- docs/src/roadmap.md — Phase 5 row added; the Frontier section rewritten
from "out of scope" to "built, both routed to human review", with the
honest note that the actual GPU run needs GPU hardware absent here.
- CLAUDE.md — Phase 5 COMPLETE status paragraph.
No trust-layer or gate change; this is documentation of work already
committed (learned policy b7297ad, kernel lane 5abeb60).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
The parser/service targets only ever needed byte-identical golden replay.
The kernel lane is the case that breaks it: a matmul optimization
(transpose-B for cache locality + eight-accumulator ILP) that REORDERS the
floating-point reduction, so its low bits differ by construction —
byte-identical is the wrong gate.
Adds:
- EquivalencePolicy::compare + Divergence (diff-test): byte-identical is
exact; fp-tolerance tokenizes and compares numeric tokens within
abs + rel*|baseline|, with explicit NaN handling. Non-numeric tokens and
token-count mismatches still fail exactly.
- fp-compare bin: applies a target's equivalence.toml to two output files.
- targets/matmul/kernel.c: matmul_ref (single-accumulator oracle) vs
matmul_opt (reordered, faster), with emit/check/run/bench modes.
- targets/matmul/equivalence.toml: fp-tolerance abs 1e-4 + rel 1e-3.
- scripts/kernel-lane-demo.sh + results/phase5/kernel-lane.txt: byte-identical
FAILs, fp-tolerance is EQUIVALENT, a +0.5 perturbation is still REJECTED,
speedup 3.23× measured with the same interleaved A/B + bootstrap CI.
Ledger row phase5-matmul-opt = needs-human-review: using the FP-tolerance
tier at all is a human-review signal (SPEC §8), same posture as mimalloc.
The trust machinery is unchanged; only the timer and the gate differ, which
is exactly the shape a future GPU kernel would slot into.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
crates/policy: reads the append-only ledger and ranks playbook classes by
the Wilson score lower bound of their machine-verified win rate — the same
'quote the lower bound' discipline the rest of the project uses. A class
that won 1/1 does not outrank one that won 8/10 (wider interval); untried
classes fall back to the cheapest-first prior; tried-and-failed classes
rank last. Advisory only — the gates still decide every verdict.
On the current 33-row ledger it ranks class 5 (algorithmic) first, then
class 3, then class 1 — the proven winners — with class 7 (untried) above
the evidence-against classes. Wins count only machine-sanitizer-verified
accepts (conservatively excluding pre-gate accepts and the overturned
comrak-010): the policy trusts the ledger's machine record, not narrative.
4 unit tests (Wilson monotonicity, small-sample penalty, ranking order).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
- docs/: an mdBook documentation site — thesis, architecture, measurement
discipline, equivalence gates, agent loop, isolation/anti-reward-hacking,
playbook, ROI, reproduce, roadmap, and the five case studies (pulled from
their single source in results/ via {{#include}}). Builds clean (21
pages).
- .github/workflows/docs.yml: builds mdBook and deploys to GitHub Pages on
push to main (one-time setup: Settings → Pages → Source = GitHub Actions).
- README.md: rewritten as the project front page — the thesis, the verified
results table, layout, quick start, how it stays honest, links to the
book. Replaces the stale Phase-0-era text.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
Human ruling on the needs-human-review allocator swap (+4.6%, CI
[+3.3%,+5.8%]): accepted as a real win for the measured comrak CLI
single-stream markdown-render workload, explicitly not a blanket
mimalloc mandate. Ledger row stays needs-human-review (append-only);
the ruling is documented in results/rulings/phase0-comrak-002.md and
reflected in the case study.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
Two defects found and fixed in a hostile review of the whole package:
1. The ROI report generator trusted the ledger verdict field and would
mint a clean $16,886/year report for phase2-comrak-010 — the
memory-leaking patch the audit overturned (immutably 'accepted' in the
append-only ledger, sanitizers_clean:false). report_row now exposes
sanitizers_clean and the report treats accepted-but-not-sanitizer-clean
as NOT shippable, printing a warning before any dollar figure. Legit
wins (sanitizers_clean:true) still render clean.
2. bench-runner service --rate 0 / --count 0 could panic via
from_secs_f64(1/0); run_session now guards finite/positive rate and
non-zero count/workers.
Attacks correctly refused (verified, no change): ledger UPDATE/DELETE,
propose_patch ../ + .git escapes, read_target_source traversal. All 10
accepted rows satisfy the green-gates + CI>=1.02 invariant. Findings
recorded in results/adversarial-review.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
phase4-cjson-service (ledger): the accepted batch win phase3-cjson-002
measured under a 150 rps coordinated-omission-correct replay (20 rounds,
40k requests, 0 drops). p50 latency +6.2%, 95% CI [+5.8%, +7.2%] —
accepted; p99 CI [0.07, 4.97] too noisy (single-worker loopback tail),
harness correctly rejected. ROI (500-core fleet, $0.04/core-hr): 27.5
cores / $9,621/year at the CI lower bound, report generated mechanically
(results/phase4/cjson-service-roi.md).
- results/phase4/: case study + README + the generated ROI report.
- CLAUDE.md: Phase 4 complete; Phases 0-4 all done.
All SPEC §5 exit criteria met across every phase; zero shipped false
accepts across the whole project.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
- bench-runner service mode (SPEC §3.1 mode c): a coordinated-omission-
correct, open-loop, fixed-rate load generator; latency measured from
the intended send time so queueing is counted, not hidden. Interleaved
A/B of two server binaries, exact percentiles (bounded sample, no HDR
bucketing error), bootstrap p50/p99 CIs via the existing ratio-CI
machine. service-calibrate: A/A false-positive + injected latency-
regression detection (calibration in progress).
- targets/cjson/service.c: minimal single-threaded HTTP server wrapping
the patched cJSON.c (trust-layer, outside the workspace allowlist);
env-toggled per-request busy-wait for the injection calibration only.
- report generator (crates/report bin): reads a ledger row +
optional service-latency JSON, renders throughput→cores→dollars and/or
latency percentiles, every figure with its CI, pricing source, and the
methodology printed inline (SPEC §9); flags any non-accepted row so a
rejected change never reads as a committed saving.
- ledger::report_row; justfile service/service-calibrate/report.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
phase3-cjson-002 (class 5+3): stack-buffer number parsing + strtod
round-trip replacing sscanf. +8.85% median, 95% CI [+7.5%, +10.0%] on
the C target, banked. 100% audit: byte-identical golden replay,
independent ASan+UBSan clean, 10k-input differential fuzz 0 divergences,
patch bounds/free-gating verified by eye.
- verdict: an infrastructure sanitizer-BUILD failure (missing runtime,
broken toolchain) now caps the accept at needs-human-review and logs
it, instead of crashing the verdict and losing a measured bench.
- results/phase3/: four public case studies (tokei class-5 wins; build
flags + allocators; the comrak caught false-accept; the cJSON
cross-language proof) + README. Compound-speedup claim stated as an
approximation, not a measured figure (CIs don't multiply).
- .gitignore: cjson build-artifact dirs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
- coz wired (harness -DHOTPATH_COZ hook, scripts, just coz) + installed,
but the apt coz runtime aborts in its own init_coz/pthread_create
interposition on this glibc (known coz bug, reproduces on the pristine
binary). Documented in results/cjson/coz/README.md; callgrind cache-sim
is the working profiler.
- cjson no-op verdict smoke: full C pipeline flows (clang {out} baseline
rebuild, Unity/CTest + golden gates, interleaved bench) to a correct
null result (median 0.9995).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
~22% of Ir in glibc float serialization (__printf_fp, cJSON print_number)
and parsing (strtod/str_to_mpn, cJSON parse_number), plus parse_value/
parse_string and malloc/free churn. Ample headroom (SPEC §6).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
20/20 sessions: A/A false-positive rate 0.000 (<0.05 required),
injected-5%-slowdown detection 1.000 (>=0.95 required). The C workload
is a trusted measurement anchor; verdict benches on cjson are now valid.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
diff-test standalone (just gates / CI target-gates) passed the now-
templated build.binary into golden replay verbatim — literal {out}.
It now builds the current tree to targets/<t>/gates-build and tests
that, with a --binary override. CI's target-gates-no-net job gains
clang/cmake, fetches+gates the cjson C target (clang build -> Unity/
CTest -> golden replay) alongside tokei.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
20 audited attempts, 0 shipped false accepts, 3 verified auto-accepted
wins (tokei class-5: +10.7%, +3.7%, +9.9%; ~1.25x vs upstream with
Phase-0 wins). Independent 20-way adversarial re-audit (phase2-final-audit
workflow) confirmed every verdict follows its evidence, correct
equivalence tier, no harness-gaming, ledger append-only intact.
Closeout changes:
- case study: full 20-row attempt table, scoreboard, corrected
comrak-010 CI upper bound (+12.1%, was +12.2%), exit-criteria section
flipped to ALL MET, OS-isolation gap marked closed.
- CLAUDE.md Current-phase line: Phase 2 complete, next Phase 3.
- verdict: derive the ledger 'phase' column from the run_id namespace
(phaseN-*) instead of the hardcoded 1 the re-audit flagged; historical
rows are immutable and stay as written (run_id prefix is authoritative).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
The pipeline auto-accepted an LSan-flagged teardown patch (+10.7%
median) because ASan/LSan were per-attempt manual; the 100% audit
overturned it (black_box liveness ends at scope close, process::exit
runs after — 384-byte arena chunk unreachable at exit). verdict now
builds the patched tree with ASan+LSan and runs the pinned workload on
every would-be accept, capping flagged wins at needs-human-review per
SPEC §8. Shipped false accepts remain 0; the win was not banked; case
study carries the corrective record.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
comrak-010's patch added an unresolvable dependency version; the
candidate build failed before the verdict binary ran, no ledger row was
ever written, and the agent polled read_verdict into its turn cap. The
detached pipeline now traps any failure into a log marker, and
read_verdict reports status=failed with the log tail instead of
'running' forever. Attempt relaunched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2