From a43255709dca24c5258b7bcfb4091a48dc67ae06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Gonzalez <Jeff@hypertheory.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 14:23:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] marmalade: loom annotates claude-marmalade.md
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Five annotations, three of them answering prompts. Committed before dissolving,
because git is the only archive of the annotation conversation — the notes file
is deleted by the response and the answers survive only inside the rewrite.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018UTxuSizozEA8yDitPuris
---
 .loom/cart/current/claude-marmalade.notes.md | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 .loom/cart/current/claude-marmalade.notes.md

diff --git a/.loom/cart/current/claude-marmalade.notes.md b/.loom/cart/current/claude-marmalade.notes.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..73f5251
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.loom/cart/current/claude-marmalade.notes.md
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# Notes on claude-marmalade.md
+<!-- annotates: claude-marmalade.md sha256:692581e0733c -->
+<!-- Protocol: do not edit claude-marmalade.md while this file exists; these annotations
+     are anchored to its line numbers. To respond, rewrite claude-marmalade.md to
+     incorporate them, then delete this file. All or nothing.
+     https://github.com/JeffryGonzalez/annotations.nvim -->
+
+## L109
+
+> ## Affirm: subcommands now, plugins not yet?
+
+Yep - subcommands now. We'll wait for subcommands until the gap is reported. ;)
+
+## L123
+
+> ## Question: does `loomctl` document itself the way loom asks everyone else to?
+
+I'm not sure - if I handed you an unfamiliar CLI and said "check this out", you'd probably do --help or something. But absolutely, at some point, we should consider that this repo should have a .loom/published with some docs or something?
+
+## L150-152
+
+> *Worth reporting upward: **"are you ready for me to convert?" and "is there
+> anything you are still writing?" are different questions**, and only the second one
+> would have caught this.*
+
+BTW, this is exactly how this is supposed to work - there is a built in buffer that we would rather mess up sometimes *in the cart* than have overly restrictive rules, etc. I messed up by not waiting until the cart was closed, etc. no biggy.
+
+## L248
+
+> **Done with the token — delete it whenever you like.** *It is in no file, no
+
+it is deleted - we'll decide where it should live soon, right? 
+
+## L313
+
+> ## Affirm: no audience declaration?
+
+This is correct - no audience. In the future we could project from all the repositories externals who they are using, etc. but nothing now.