mirror of
https://github.com/bdbrown4/peltier.io.git
synced 2026-11-07 10:58:28 +00:00
crates/policy: reads the append-only ledger and ranks playbook classes by the Wilson score lower bound of their machine-verified win rate — the same 'quote the lower bound' discipline the rest of the project uses. A class that won 1/1 does not outrank one that won 8/10 (wider interval); untried classes fall back to the cheapest-first prior; tried-and-failed classes rank last. Advisory only — the gates still decide every verdict. On the current 33-row ledger it ranks class 5 (algorithmic) first, then class 3, then class 1 — the proven winners — with class 7 (untried) above the evidence-against classes. Wins count only machine-sanitizer-verified accepts (conservatively excluding pre-gate accepts and the overturned comrak-010): the policy trusts the ledger's machine record, not narrative. 4 unit tests (Wilson monotonicity, small-sample penalty, ranking order). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
163 lines
5.8 KiB
Rust
163 lines
5.8 KiB
Rust
//! Learned class-selection policy (SPEC §13 research fork).
|
|
//!
|
|
//! The append-only ledger is a growing dataset of `(playbook_class,
|
|
//! target) -> verdict`. This turns that history into a *prior*: given a
|
|
//! target, rank the playbook classes by how likely each is to yield a
|
|
//! shippable win — learned from evidence, not the fixed cheapest-first
|
|
//! order alone.
|
|
//!
|
|
//! The ranking statistic is the **Wilson score lower bound** of the
|
|
//! win-rate, not the point estimate. This is the same discipline the rest
|
|
//! of the project uses (quote the CI lower bound, never the median): a
|
|
//! class that won 1/1 does NOT outrank one that won 8/10, because its
|
|
//! interval is wide. With no data a class scores 0 and falls back to the
|
|
//! cheapest-first prior. As the ledger grows, the estimates sharpen — the
|
|
//! policy is honest about its own uncertainty by construction.
|
|
|
|
/// Wilson score interval lower bound for `wins`/`n` at z (1.96 = 95%).
|
|
/// Returns 0.0 for n == 0 (no evidence).
|
|
pub fn wilson_lower_bound(wins: u64, n: u64, z: f64) -> f64 {
|
|
if n == 0 {
|
|
return 0.0;
|
|
}
|
|
let n = n as f64;
|
|
let p = wins as f64 / n;
|
|
let z2 = z * z;
|
|
let denom = 1.0 + z2 / n;
|
|
let center = p + z2 / (2.0 * n);
|
|
let margin = z * (p * (1.0 - p) / n + z2 / (4.0 * n * n)).sqrt();
|
|
((center - margin) / denom).max(0.0)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Aggregated evidence for one playbook class.
|
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
|
|
pub struct ClassStat {
|
|
pub class: u8,
|
|
pub attempts: u64,
|
|
/// Shippable wins: `accepted` AND sanitizers-clean.
|
|
pub wins: u64,
|
|
/// Real wins held for a human ruling (needs-human-review) — counted
|
|
/// separately, since they are neither clean auto-wins nor failures.
|
|
pub held: u64,
|
|
pub win_rate: f64,
|
|
pub wilson_lb: f64,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl ClassStat {
|
|
/// A short human note on the evidence state.
|
|
pub fn note(&self) -> &'static str {
|
|
if self.attempts == 0 {
|
|
"untried — cheapest-first prior only"
|
|
} else if self.wins > 0 {
|
|
"proven winner"
|
|
} else if self.held > 0 {
|
|
"held for human review (measured win, tier-gated)"
|
|
} else {
|
|
"evidence against — tried, no shippable win"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Build per-class stats (classes 1..=7) from ledger outcome rows,
|
|
/// optionally filtered to one target. Each outcome is
|
|
/// `(class, target, verdict, sanitizers_clean)`.
|
|
pub fn class_stats(
|
|
outcomes: &[(u8, String, String, bool)],
|
|
target: Option<&str>,
|
|
z: f64,
|
|
) -> Vec<ClassStat> {
|
|
(1u8..=7)
|
|
.map(|class| {
|
|
let rows = outcomes
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.filter(|(c, t, _, _)| *c == class && target.is_none_or(|want| t == want));
|
|
let (mut attempts, mut wins, mut held) = (0u64, 0u64, 0u64);
|
|
for (_, _, verdict, san) in rows {
|
|
attempts += 1;
|
|
if verdict == "accepted" && *san {
|
|
wins += 1;
|
|
} else if verdict == "needs-human-review" {
|
|
held += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
let win_rate = if attempts > 0 {
|
|
wins as f64 / attempts as f64
|
|
} else {
|
|
0.0
|
|
};
|
|
ClassStat {
|
|
class,
|
|
attempts,
|
|
wins,
|
|
held,
|
|
win_rate,
|
|
wilson_lb: wilson_lower_bound(wins, attempts, z),
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.collect()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Rank classes for selection. Primary key: Wilson lower bound (evidence
|
|
/// of success), descending. Ties (notably all the zero-evidence classes)
|
|
/// break by: fewer failed attempts first (prefer untried over
|
|
/// proven-failure), then cheaper class first (the cost prior).
|
|
pub fn rank(mut stats: Vec<ClassStat>) -> Vec<ClassStat> {
|
|
stats.sort_by(|a, b| {
|
|
b.wilson_lb
|
|
.partial_cmp(&a.wilson_lb)
|
|
.unwrap_or(std::cmp::Ordering::Equal)
|
|
.then_with(|| {
|
|
// failures = attempts without a win or a hold
|
|
let fa = a.attempts - a.wins - a.held;
|
|
let fb = b.attempts - b.wins - b.held;
|
|
fa.cmp(&fb)
|
|
})
|
|
.then_with(|| a.class.cmp(&b.class))
|
|
});
|
|
stats
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
mod tests {
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn wilson_is_zero_without_evidence() {
|
|
assert_eq!(wilson_lower_bound(0, 0, 1.96), 0.0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn wilson_penalizes_small_samples() {
|
|
// 1/1 must NOT outrank 8/10 — the small sample's interval is wide.
|
|
let one_of_one = wilson_lower_bound(1, 1, 1.96);
|
|
let eight_of_ten = wilson_lower_bound(8, 10, 1.96);
|
|
assert!(
|
|
one_of_one < eight_of_ten,
|
|
"1/1 ({one_of_one:.3}) should rank below 8/10 ({eight_of_ten:.3})"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn wilson_monotonic_in_evidence() {
|
|
// Same rate, more evidence → higher lower bound.
|
|
assert!(wilson_lower_bound(50, 100, 1.96) > wilson_lower_bound(5, 10, 1.96));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
fn rank_prefers_proven_then_untried_then_failed() {
|
|
let outcomes = vec![
|
|
(5u8, "t".into(), "accepted".into(), true),
|
|
(5u8, "t".into(), "accepted".into(), true),
|
|
(5u8, "t".into(), "rejected-bench".into(), false),
|
|
(6u8, "t".into(), "rejected-bench".into(), false), // evidence against
|
|
// class 7 untried
|
|
];
|
|
let ranked = rank(class_stats(&outcomes, None, 1.96));
|
|
assert_eq!(ranked[0].class, 5, "proven class 5 ranks first");
|
|
// untried class (7) must rank above the tried-and-failed class 6
|
|
let pos7 = ranked.iter().position(|s| s.class == 7).unwrap();
|
|
let pos6 = ranked.iter().position(|s| s.class == 6).unwrap();
|
|
assert!(pos7 < pos6, "untried class 7 outranks failed class 6");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|