Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude b12813def8 phase4: service-mode calibration PASS (0/10 A/A false-positive, 10/10 injection detection)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
2026-07-11 23:41:57 +00:00
Claude f5f4c10b63 phase3: cjson A/A calibration anchor — PASS
20/20 sessions: A/A false-positive rate 0.000 (<0.05 required),
injected-5%-slowdown detection 1.000 (>=0.95 required). The C workload
is a trusted measurement anchor; verdict benches on cjson are now valid.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
2026-07-11 18:34:46 +00:00
Claude 2813b0b96a phase1: complete — GH-runner 20-session calibration is trust anchor #2
Full-protocol calibration on a GitHub-hosted runner: A/A false-positive
0/20, injected-5%-slowdown detection 20/20, per-session CIs transcribed
with run provenance (artifacts expire; the md is the durable record).
With the local-container anchor and gates running end-to-end on both
targets in CI, all SPEC §5 Phase 1 exit criteria are met on free
infrastructure. CLAUDE.md phase line moved to Phase 2 (agent);
dedicated pinned hardware remains listed in docs/infra.md as the bar
for Phase 3/4 customer-facing case studies.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
2026-07-09 22:38:43 +00:00
Claude 73763321c6 bench: automated A/A + regression-injection calibration (Phase 1)
Adds 'bench-runner calibrate': N A/A sessions counted against a <5%
false-positive bar, and N sessions with a synthetic slowdown injected
as a real busy-wait inside the candidate's timed window, counted
against a >=95% detection bar (detected = ratio CI entirely below 1.0).
Bootstrap seed varies per session so resampling noise is not
correlated across the very statistic being validated. JSON evidence
includes per-session CIs, injected wait, acceptance verdict, and env
fingerprint.

First run against the real comrak workload (20+20 sessions, pinned
core): false-positive rate 0.000, detection rate 0.950 -> PASS.
Evidence: results/calibration/2026-07-06-comrak-full-calibration.json.
Closes the SPEC 3.1 acceptance-criteria gap; remaining Phase 1 gaps:
no-net containers, perf profiling, diff-test orchestration, agent IPC.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
2026-07-06 20:20:40 +00:00
Claude 7c3c59f5f8 phase0: dry run — comrak & tokei vendored, 3 attempts in ledger
Target selection (SPEC §6): comrak 0.53.0 (45c1995, BSD-2-Clause) and
tokei 14.0.0 (fa44e51, MIT/Apache-2.0); both CPU-bound with pinned
corpora (progit book 11MB; 8x replicated pinned trees, 221MB) and
committed MANIFEST.sha256 + golden-output pins + regen scripts.

Calibration: A/A null verdicts on both real workloads; taskset -c 2
pinning tightens the A/A CI from [0.938, 1.008] to [0.993, 1.008],
making the 2% accept threshold meaningful in this container.

Profiles (callgrind; perf unavailable): comrak allocator symbols 26.7%
of Ir; tokei perform_multi_line_analysis 31.7%.

Attempts (ledger + results/phase0/):
- comrak class-1 target-cpu=native: null [0.983, 1.011], rejected-bench
- comrak class-2 mimalloc swap: +4.6% [1.033, 1.058], 848 upstream
  tests green, golden byte-identical, ASan-proper clean; LSan flags
  484B in onig (reachability false-positive analysis in case study) ->
  needs-human-review per SPEC §8
- tokei class-1 fat LTO+cgu=1: +1.6% [1.003, 1.026], real but under
  the 2% bar, rejected-bench

Also: ledger-cli for manual rows, targets/ excluded from trust-layer
workspace, corpora/build artifacts gitignored, case study written.
Phase 0 exit criteria (>=10% verified win) not yet met; next
hypotheses logged in results/phase0/attempts.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
2026-07-06 19:28:50 +00:00
Claude 328aafae77 Bootstrap hotpath from engineering spec v0.1
Commit the spec and scaffold the system it describes:

- SPEC.md: the full v0.1 engineering spec
- crates/: trust-layer Rust workspace, unit-tested
  - bench-runner: interleaved ABAB scheduling with discarded warm-ups,
    deterministic bootstrap CIs over the ratio of medians,
    CI-lower-bound accept rule, env fingerprinting, and a CLI with
    compare + A/A self-test modes (A/A verified passing end-to-end)
  - diff-test: gate outcome model, sha256 corpus pin verifier that
    refuses on mismatch, per-target equivalence policy parser
    (byte-identical default, explicit fp-tolerance opt-in)
  - ledger: append-only SQLite attempt schema with UPDATE/DELETE
    refused by triggers, anti-double-attempt query
  - report: cores-saved and dollars/yr ROI math over speedup CIs,
    pricing.toml inputs
- playbook/: classes 1-7 with preconditions, procedure, verification
  notes, and known failure modes per class
- agent/: Python package skeleton — six-tool contract and prompting
  spine, harness IPC deferred to Phase 1
- config/: accept.toml (2% threshold, 30 runs/side), pricing.toml
- targets/, corpora/, results/calibration/: layout and policy docs

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
2026-07-06 18:34:51 +00:00