The reusable artifact here was never the vendored targets — it is the
discipline: prove equivalence, prove significance, or claim nothing. This
packages it as a Claude Code skill usable from any repo.
Two modes. `verify` works anywhere, on any two shell commands in any
language: equivalence before timing -> A/A calibration -> interleaved A/B
with a bootstrap CI -> a verdict decided by the CI lower bound, never the
median. `attempt` drives the full in-repo loop (gates, pristine-baseline
verdict, ledger row, ROI report).
It drives the real bench-runner binary and refuses rather than degrade: on
an unsupported host, or with no trust layer reachable, preflight stops and
says so instead of falling back to a hand-rolled timing loop. A second copy
of the statistics is a second thing that can lie. A refusal ends the claim,
not the work.
An adversarial review of the skill caught six high-severity defects, all
fixed here — several of them the very errors the skill exists to prevent:
- verify mode had no risk classification at all. bench-runner emits only
accepted/rejected-bench; needs-human-review is minted by the in-repo
verdict path, which verify does not run. A concurrency change with
byte-identical output would have sailed through as "accepted". The skill
now makes the agent the classifier and says so explicitly.
- the accept template exposed `pin_prefix`, which is inert for
compare/aa/calibrate (only `verdict` reads it) — an agent would have set
it and reported pinning that never happened. Now documents wrapping both
sides in taskset instead.
- the equivalence gate compared stdout only, so two commands that write to
stderr and a dist/ tree would "GOLDEN PASS" on two empty files. Now hashes
stdout + stderr + exit code + artifact tree, and an empty diff over empty
output is a failed gate, not a passed one.
- nothing told the agent to build two coexisting immutable artifacts, so a
`cargo run` baseline could rebuild from the patched tree mid-bench — the
exact trap phase1-verdict-smoke-001 recorded.
- service mode was documented as generic HTTP. It is not: the server must
take <port> <doc> <iters>, print READY, and close the connection. A stock
Express app hangs the harness forever. Contract now stated.
- the CI refusal test could not pass: preflight also walks up from its own
location, so running it in-place found this very repo. The test now copies
the skill out of the tree first.
CI job `skill-preflight` asserts the contract that matters — resolve when a
trust layer is reachable, REFUSE when it is not, and work when consumed from
another repo via PELTIER_HOME. It deliberately does not assert a statistical
outcome: a shared runner is too noisy for that, which is precisely why the
skill calibrates before it claims.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
