phase5: closeout — research-forks case study, docs chapter, roadmap + CLAUDE.md

Phase 5 write-up for the two SPEC §13 forks now that both are built:
  - results/phase5/README.md — the full argument for each fork, with the
    kernel-lane demo and learned-policy ranking tables and reproduce commands.
  - results/phase5/learned-policy.txt — captured `cargo run -p policy` output
    over the 34-row ledger.
  - docs/src/research-forks.md — new mdBook chapter, wired into SUMMARY.md.
  - docs/src/roadmap.md — Phase 5 row added; the Frontier section rewritten
    from "out of scope" to "built, both routed to human review", with the
    honest note that the actual GPU run needs GPU hardware absent here.
  - CLAUDE.md — Phase 5 COMPLETE status paragraph.

No trust-layer or gate change; this is documentation of work already
committed (learned policy b7297ad, kernel lane 5abeb60).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EcKPWQ3MQD4NdEHwar96u2
This commit is contained in:
Claude
2026-07-12 00:38:44 +00:00
parent 5abeb608e0
commit ff16e67127
6 changed files with 289 additions and 15 deletions
+17
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
learned class-selection ranking — evidence: 34 ledger rows, scope: all targets
(Wilson 95% lower bound of the shippable-win rate; ties break untried-before-failed, then cheapest-first)
rank class attempts wins held win-rate wilson-lb note
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 5 algorithmic 16 3 1 19% 0.066 proven winner
2 3 alloc-churn 4 1 0 25% 0.046 proven winner
3 1 build-config 9 1 0 11% 0.020 proven winner
4 7 concurrency 0 0 0 0% 0.000 untried — cheapest-first prior only
5 2 allocator 2 0 1 0% 0.000 held for human review (measured win, tier-gated)
6 4 data-layout 1 0 0 0% 0.000 evidence against — tried, no shippable win
7 6 simd 2 0 0 0% 0.000 evidence against — tried, no shippable win
recommendation: try class 5 (algorithmic) first — best evidence (Wilson lb 0.066); then the next-ranked class whose profile preconditions match.
Advisory only — the equivalence + significance gates decide every verdict. This ranking sharpens as the ledger grows.
note: a 'win' counts only machine-sanitizer-verified accepts. Pre-sanitizer-gate accepts and the overturned comrak-010 are conservatively excluded — the policy trusts the ledger's machine record, not the external audit narrative.