skill: make the peltier skill consumable across agent harnesses

The SKILL.md Agent Skills standard (agentskills.io) is now read natively by
Codex, Copilot, VS Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, opencode, Goose, Amp, Zed,
Factory, and ZeroClaw — so the portable move is not per-harness adapter
files (forked content that drifts) but one canonical skill placed where
each harness actually looks.

- Spec-compliant frontmatter: license, compatibility (the Linux-only
  measurement story, stated up front), version/author/tags top-level
  (ZeroClaw's runtime reads those; the spec ignores unknown fields).
  reference/ renamed to references/ per the spec's conventional layout.
- .agents/skills/peltier/ mirror: the cross-tool convergence path (Codex,
  Zed, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Copilot, opencode, Goose, Amp). Byte-identical
  to the .claude canonical, enforced by CI — drift between the two copies
  is a red build, not a footnote.
- AGENTS.md at the repo root for the ~20 harnesses that read it (Claude
  Code does not; CLAUDE.md remains its file). Deliberately thin: it points
  at CLAUDE.md and the skill instead of restating rules.
- scripts/install-skill.sh: stamps a consumer repo at both discovery paths
  (--layout claude|agents|both), or emits a script-less --zeroclaw-variant.
  ZeroClaw's skill security policy blocks script files by default
  (skills.allow_scripts off) — its audit rejected the full skill and passes
  the variant, verified against the real zeroclaw binary. The variant loses
  nothing: preflight.sh still exists exactly once, in the peltier checkout
  the skill already requires, and SKILL.md now documents running it from
  there. Re-implementing preflight inline is named as a refusal condition.
- CI (skill-preflight): frontmatter upgraded to a full Agent Skills spec
  conformance check on BOTH copies (name rules, dir match, description and
  body limits, metadata string-map), plus mirror equality and a functional
  installer test (both layouts identical to canonical, variant carries no
  scripts/, nonexistent target refused).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.agents/skills/peltier/references/attempt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# attempt — the full loop, inside a peltier checkout
+
+Profile → hypothesize → patch → gated verdict → ledger row. This mode only
+applies when you are working **inside a peltier checkout** on a target that has
+a `targets/<name>/target.toml`. Everywhere else, use
+[verify.md](verify.md).
+
+Requires Linux (harnessd uses Unix sockets and `setsid`; every gate shells
+through `sh`).
+
+## Before you touch anything
+
+**Read the ledger first.** It records every attempt ever made on this target,
+including the failures — which is exactly what stops you re-running a dead
+end:
+
+    cargo run -p policy          # ranks playbook classes by their evidence
+
+`policy` reads the ledger and ranks optimization classes by the Wilson lower
+bound of their shippable-win rate. It is **advisory** — a learned prior over
+the fixed cheapest-first order. The gates still decide every verdict.
+
+**Then respect the order.** Cheapest wins first: build flags → LTO → PGO →
+allocator swap → *then* code changes. Do not hand-write SIMD before trying
+`-O3`. The playbook (`playbook/`) has the preconditions and known risks for
+each class.
+
+## The boundary you may not cross
+
+The agent may modify **only** allowlisted paths under `targets/<name>/`.
+`crates/`, `config/`, `corpora/`, and the upstream test suites are read-only:
+the thing being measured does not get to grade itself. `harnessd` enforces
+this on every proposed diff (path allowlist over every diff header, including
+`rename`/`copy` — a patch that tries to escape is rejected, not sanitized).
+
+## Log the hypothesis *before* patching
+
+A hypothesis written after seeing the numbers is not a hypothesis. State what
+you think is slow, why, and what you expect the change to buy — then patch.
+
+## Run the gates
+
+    just gates <target>
+
+Corpus pin → test-suite pin (when `corpora/<t>/TESTSUITE.sha256` exists) →
+upstream tests → golden replay. Note what this **does not** do: differential
+fuzz needs a pristine baseline to differ against, so it reports `Skipped` here
+and runs for real on the accept path below. `just gates` is a fast equivalence
+check, not a fuzz run — do not report it as one.
+
+## The verdict — the only thing that can accept a change
+
+    just verdict <target> <candidate-bin> <run-id> <class> "<hypothesis>" "<hotspot>" \
+        --patch-file <diff>
+
+This rebuilds a **pristine baseline** from the pinned upstream commit (not
+whatever is lying around in your tree), runs the full gate set against the
+candidate, benches interleaved A/B against that baseline, and writes one
+append-only ledger row with the verdict and the complete evidence.
+
+It will refuse to hand you an `accepted` unless:
+
+- the upstream test suite is green **and** golden replay is byte-identical (or
+  within the target's declared FP tolerance);
+- the **differential-fuzz gate actually passed** — a real run reporting zero
+  divergences. No fuzz run, no machine accept. Ever;
+- ASan/UBSan are clean (and TSan, when the target configures it);
+- the bootstrap 95% CI lower bound of the speedup clears the threshold in
+  `config/accept.toml` (default 2%);
+- and a conservative lexical risk classifier finds **no** concurrency, unsafe,
+  or floating-point signals in the patch. If it does, the verdict is capped at
+  `needs-human-review` no matter how good the numbers are.
+
+Any of these failing produces a rejected row. **That is a complete, valid
+outcome** — the row is the deliverable. Write it and move on. Do not iterate on
+a rejected patch more than twice without a genuinely new hypothesis.
+
+## Report
+
+    just report <run-id>
+
+Mechanically generates the ROI from the ledger row: throughput → cores →
+dollars, and/or latency percentiles — every figure with its CI, workload, and
+methodology printed inline. It flags any row that was not accepted, so a
+rejected attempt cannot be laundered into a dollar figure.
+
+## Unattended
+
+    just agent-attempt <target> <run-id>
+
+Runs one full attempt behind the OS boundary: `harnessd` as the trusted uid on
+a Unix socket, the agent loop as an unprivileged user, the verdict pipeline
+wrapped in a network namespace (`scripts/no-net.sh`) that **fails closed** — if
+namespaces are unavailable it refuses to run rather than quietly running with
+the network up. `just isolation-check` verifies the boundary from the agent's
+side.
+
+## When the numbers are good and the change is scary
+
+FP-ordering, concurrency primitives, anything UB-adjacent: `needs-human-review`,
+always, regardless of the speedup. This is not a formality. The one false
+accept in peltier's history (`phase2-comrak-010`) passed its bench and was
+caught by a human audit afterwards — which is precisely why the sanitizer lane
+is now machine-enforced and why this rule does not bend.